<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Debate Rankings</title>
	<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>About the NDR</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/about-the-ndr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/about-the-ndr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/about-the-ndr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1995 Mike Bietz suggested a national ranking system of LD debaters on the original LD-L Listserv.  This was met by a great deal of resistance and even a threat of lawsuits if certain schools showed up on the ranking system.  Alas, the idea was put to rest.
In 2003 Jeb Puryear brought back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1995 Mike Bietz suggested a national ranking system of LD debaters on the original LD-L Listserv.  This was met by a great deal of resistance and even a threat of lawsuits if certain schools showed up on the ranking system.  Alas, the idea was put to rest.</p>
<p>In 2003 Jeb Puryear brought back the idea when he launched The National Debate Rankings.  With multiple tweakings to the system, the NDR now uses the ELO system used by chess players to their rankings.  You can read more about the rankings at: <a href="http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/the-ndr-explained/">The NDR Explained</a>.</p>
<p>The NDR is now:<br />
Jeb Puryear: jeb@nationaldebaterankings.net<br />
Vineet Singal (intern): vineet@nationaldebaterankings.net</p>
<p>The NDR is hosted by Victory Briefs, LLC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/about-the-ndr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submit Results</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/submit-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/submit-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/submit-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are looking for results from all seasons from the last 5 years!  Please submit them if you have them!
For the NDR to work, we need people to submit results.
** PLEASE NOTE** we will only enter results for tournaments that meet the following:
1. Are submitted as a complete tournament packet.  We cannot just do pages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are looking for results from all seasons from the last 5 years!  Please submit them if you have them!</p>
<p>For the NDR to work, we need people to submit results.</p>
<p>** PLEASE NOTE** we will only enter results for tournaments that meet the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Are submitted as a complete tournament packet.  We cannot just do pages that have, for example, your team on them.</p>
<p>2. TRPC or similar tab programs are the preferred method.</p>
<p>3. The results sheet must show both the debater AND the opponent in the same cell.  We cannot piece together tournaments.</p></blockquote>
<p>Please submit results by Fax or by Email (in a PDF)</p>
<p>Fax number for the NDR:  (866) 612-3691</p>
<p>Or email to: <a href="mailto:results@nationaldebaterankings.net" target="_blank">results@nationaldebaterankings.net </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/submit-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NDR Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/the-ndr-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/the-ndr-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/the-ndr-explained/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new NDR system for 07-08 will be, at its core, based on the ELO rating system (similar to the system used for rating chess players). Debaters will see individual ratings move up and down based on final placement at tournaments. The bigger the tournament (the higher the ratings of debaters at the tournament) the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new NDR system for 07-08 will be, at its core, based on the ELO rating system (similar to the system used for rating chess players). Debaters will see individual ratings move up and down based on final placement at tournaments. The bigger the tournament (the higher the ratings of debaters at the tournament) the more a debater can move up or down. Essentially if someone outperforms expectations based on their previous tournament success they will go up, if they underperform they will move down. Expected finish will be based on the debaters latest rating to give the most up to date probability (based on the idea that debaters will often get on a hot/cold streak), but the overall ranking will be based on an average of ratings over time (last X number of tournaments) to give a broader picture of debater performance. Additionally the system will carry over from season to season.</p>
<p>The most exciting facet of the new system is since it only weights tournaments based on the strength of the field, ANY tournament could be included to provide a deeper view of debater success. This could include state tournaments, larger regional tournaments, round robins, or even NFL or NCFL as long as an overall order of finish could be discerned. The system should be able to provide a much better picture of how younger and local talents are doing in the grand scheme of things. The biggest goal of the new NDR is to include results from any tournament we can get our hands on without regard for the prestige of the tournament because we believe tournament importance should be based on the strength of field that show up at a tournament when it happens not on a designation from on high made in the middle of the summer.</p>
<p>*An &#8220;expected&#8221; percentile is statisically calculated based on the  ratings that each debater at the tournament had going into the event  (all new debaters start with a rating of 1000, people who have  previously been to a tournament have their last rating used)</p>
<p>*All  the debaters at a tournament are ranked and given a percentile reflecting how they finished</p>
<p>*If you do better than expected your rating goes up, if you do worse it goes down</p>
<p>*The maximum amount a person can move up or down depends on the size/strength of the tournament fields (which is also tied into the initial ratings)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/the-ndr-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2004-2005 Final Squad NDR</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-squad-ndr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-squad-ndr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-squad-ndr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Debate Rankings 2004-2005 LD - SQUADS
Rk    School Code (Name)    ST    Rating
1    OHSODEF         CA    5796
2    Scarsdale         NY    5789
3    Lynbrook         CA    5787
4    Highland Park         MN    5624
5    Hockaday         TX    5605
6    Valley             IA    5576
7    Edina            MN    5574
8    Schreiber         NY    5513
9    Trinity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Debate Rankings 2004-2005 LD - SQUADS<br />
Rk    School Code (Name)    ST    Rating<br />
1    OHSODEF         CA    5796<br />
2    Scarsdale         NY    5789<br />
3    Lynbrook         CA    5787<br />
4    Highland Park         MN    5624<br />
5    Hockaday         TX    5605<br />
6    Valley             IA    5576<br />
7    Edina            MN    5574<br />
8    Schreiber         NY    5513<br />
9    Trinity Prep         FL    5381<br />
10    Bishop Guertin         NH    5364<br />
11    Ridge             NJ    5341<br />
12    Randolph         NJ    5229<br />
13    Hendrick Hudson        NY    5178<br />
14    Manchester Essex     MA    5141<br />
15    Celebration        FL    5100<br />
16    Archer            CA    5067<br />
17    Lake Highland         FL    5027<br />
18    Regis             NY    5024<br />
19    James Logan         CA    4986<br />
20    Pine Crest        FL    4895<br />
21    Monticello         NY    4879<br />
22    Meadows         NV    4875<br />
23    San Marino         CA    4778<br />
24    Grapevine         TX    4755<br />
25    S.F. Austin        TX    4741</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-squad-ndr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2004-2005 FINAL NDR</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-ndr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-ndr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-ndr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the ranking for the final NDR for 2004-2005 season.
Individual Debaters
1	Greenhill DW (David Wolfish)		TX	Sr	1261
2	Scarsdale MSh (Matt Shields)		NY	Jr	1248
3	Monte Vista-Danville WL (Will Leiter)	CA	Jr	1229
4	Mountain View PR (Prashant Rai)		CA	Jr	1216
5	Des Moines North ER (Ernie Rose)	IA	Sr	1216
6	Schreiber AP (Adwait Parker)		NY	Sr	1215
7	Palo Alto DS (Daniel Sheehan)		CA	Sr	1215
8	Lynbrook SS (Shyaam Subramanian)	CA	Sr	1214
9	Schreiber PG (Petey Gil)		NY	Sr	1211
10	Jersey Village BC (Bryan Cory)		TX	Sr	1210
10	Glenbrook North AP (Ari Parker)		IL	Jr	1210
12	Celebration TT (Tara Tedrow)		FL	Sr	1210
13	Highland [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the ranking for the final NDR for 2004-2005 season.</p>
<p><strong>Individual Debaters</strong><br />
1	Greenhill DW (David Wolfish)		TX	Sr	1261<br />
2	Scarsdale MSh (Matt Shields)		NY	Jr	1248<br />
3	Monte Vista-Danville WL (Will Leiter)	CA	Jr	1229<br />
4	Mountain View PR (Prashant Rai)		CA	Jr	1216<br />
5	Des Moines North ER (Ernie Rose)	IA	Sr	1216<br />
6	Schreiber AP (Adwait Parker)		NY	Sr	1215<br />
7	Palo Alto DS (Daniel Sheehan)		CA	Sr	1215<br />
8	Lynbrook SS (Shyaam Subramanian)	CA	Sr	1214<br />
9	Schreiber PG (Petey Gil)		NY	Sr	1211<br />
10	Jersey Village BC (Bryan Cory)		TX	Sr	1210<br />
10	Glenbrook North AP (Ari Parker)		IL	Jr	1210<br />
12	Celebration TT (Tara Tedrow)		FL	Sr	1210<br />
13	Highland Park NS (Nel Smiley)		TX	Sr	1208<br />
14	Lynbrook TB (Tripti Bhattacharya)	CA	Jr	1208<br />
15	Greenhill TV (Tisha Vaidya)		TX	Sr	1206<br />
16	OHSODEF FT (Fabien Thayamballi)		CA	Sr	1201<br />
17	Mayde Creek JD (Jeremy Dudley)		TX	Jr	1200<br />
18	Edina CT (Casey Trombley-Shapiro)	MN	Sr	1200<br />
19	Niskayuna SB (Scott Brainard)		NY	Sr	1199<br />
20	La Jolla AS (Alex Smith)		CA	Sr	1196<br />
21	Strake Jesuit AW (Andy Werner)		TX	Jr	1195<br />
22	James Logan BZ (Bonan Zhou)		CA	Jr	1194<br />
23	St James MM (Michael Mangus)		AL	Jr	1193<br />
24	Highland Park KP (Katie Poulos)		MN	Jr	1189<br />
25	OHSODEF HJ (Hirsh Jain)			CA	Sr	1186<br />
26	Des Moines North KL (Kim Larson)	IA	Jr	1186<br />
27	Marcus MK (Matt Kinskey)		TX	Sr	1186<br />
28	Mountain View SH (Stephen Hess)		CA	Jr	1185<br />
29	Harker AH (Alex Hsu)			CA	Sr	1185<br />
30	Churchill LM (Levi Moreno)		TX	Sr	1184<br />
31	Hockaday AnM (A.J. Motgi)		TX	Jr	1181<br />
32	Randolph ML (Matt Levinson)		NJ	Jr	1176</p>
<p>The whole list can be seen here:  <a href="http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/final0405ndr.pdf" title="0405FinalNDR">0405FinalNDR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/2004-2005-final-ndr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Description of the New NDR</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bietz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/hello-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are in the process of putting together the new National Debate Rankings.  You can read about the formula by clicking on the &#8220;about&#8221; link on the right.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are in the process of putting together the new National Debate Rankings.  You can read about the formula by clicking on the &#8220;about&#8221; link on the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaldebaterankings.net/2007/04/17/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
